Silenced in the Barracks
The Pentagon fails to protect U.S. troops from sexual abuse
March 09, 2008
By Jessica Pupovac
Source:
ITT
When military sexual
assault survivors call Susan Avila-Smith, she advises them to keep their mouths
shut while she works on getting them home.
"It breaks my heart to do that," she says, "but I want to get them out alive and
that's my main goal."
Since she left the Army
in 1995, Avila-Smith estimates that she has helped about 1,200 rape
survivors separate from the U.S. Armed Forces and claim their Veterans
Affairs (VA) benefits. As founder of Women Organizing Women, an online
support group for survivors of military sexual trauma (MST), Avila-Smith has
heard it all. But lately, she's been more sensitive than usual.
"Maria's case has
triggered something in me," she says. "I imagine the VAs are filling up
right now with women who never even stepped foot in there before."
"Maria" is 20-year-old
Marine Lance Cpl. Maria Lauterbach, who disappeared from Camp Lejeune,
outside of Jacksonville, N.C., on Dec. 14, 2007, one month before she was
expected to give birth. As the local police enlisted the press to help reach
out to Lauterbach and solicit information from the local community, it was
soon reported that she had recently accused a superior at Camp Lejeune of
rape.
Naval Criminal
Investigative Service agent Paul Ciccarelli attempted to quell suspicions
that the two might be linked, assuring the Associated Press that the "sexual
encounter" was "not criminal." On Jan. 10, the Marine Corps Times,
a weekly newspaper serving military personnel, bolstered this claim,
speculating that she may have fled to avoid charges for "making false
statements."
That same day,
Lauterbach's accused assailant, Marine Cpl. Cesar Laurean, was scheduled to
appear at the Onslow County Sheriff's office for questioning. He never
showed up. On Jan. 11, Laurean, who had reported for duty for a full month
after Lauterbach's disappearance, failed to do so. His wife told
investigators that she believed he had left for Mexico and gave
investigators a note written by Laurean that said Lauterbach had slit her
own throat with a knife, and he then buried her. Detectives have rejected
that claim, and an autopsy found that Lauterbach died of a blunt force
trauma to the head.
Later that day, her
charred body was uncovered in a shallow grave behind the Laurean home. The
horrific discovery took place only weeks before she was to testify against
Laurean.
The drama set off a
media frenzy, with updates on the cross-border manhunt constantly flashing
across CNN tickers. Radio and talk show hosts, meanwhile, dissected
Lauterbach's character and credibility and questioned the delayed military
response.
But Avila-Smith wasn't
surprised. "Unfortunately, the way her case was handled is the norm," she
says.
The Lauterbach case,
according to Avila-Smith and many others, exemplifies the "criminal failure"
of all branches of the military to address sexual assault for what it is--a
violent crime. It is a "broken system" that she says puts victims on the
defense, grants immunity to assailants and, in the end, puts rape survivors
who have the courage to speak out, in even greater danger than if they had
just accepted the abuse as collateral damage in their military careers.
Missing the mark
In 2003, a firestorm of
media reports and investigations, prompted by an anonymous whistleblower at
the Air Force Academy, exposed the prevalence of sexual assault in the armed
forces and its training centers. That same year, the results of a study
conducted by Dr. Anne Sadler of the Iowa City VA Medical Center found 28
percent of female veterans having suffered MST while on active duty.
In response, Congress
called on the Department of Defense to overhaul its approach to sexual
assault within its ranks. The 2005 defense authorization bill mandated the
creation of the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO),
which, according to its website, has since served as "the single point of
accountability and oversight for sexual assault policy."
SAPRO has made many
strides in fine-tuning the Uniform Code of Military Justice and encouraging
MST reporting. It has held a range of workshops, trainings and outreach
campaigns to define and denounce sexual assault. It also has set up a
website to educate service members on how to deal with--and deter--the
crime. At the same time, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators (SARCs) and
victim advocates have been stationed on every major base to coordinate
victims' services.
However, according to
many women, the reforms are missing the mark.
Former Army Pvt. 1st
Class Jessica Doe, who prefers that her last name remain confidential, says
that after she was raped by an instructor at Fort Eustis, Va., the SARC
"blew it off like it was nothing." Jessica pressed charges anyway, but says
all that came of her search for justice was "rumors, scorn and lack of
friends within my own unit." The instructor was verbally reprimanded.
"I lost my benefits and
everything," she says. "I lost my career because the Army was going to be my
career."
Interrogators, not
investigators
A 2004 survey of U.S.
service members conducted by the Pentagon's Advisory Committee on Women in
the Services found fear of repercussions to be the number one "perceived
barrier" to reporting sexual abuse, noted by 81 percent of female
respondents and 73 percent of male respondents.
Confidentiality,
career-related concerns and distrust of leadership were also cited by a
majority of rape victims.
Marine Cpl. Brittany
Thornton says a member of her unit in Okinawa, Japan, raped her on Christmas
Day 2005. She reported the incident right away, pressed charges and was put
on antidepressants, which she says her commanding officer saw as reason to
remove her from her post in weapons maintenance and assign her to a desk
job.
"They revoked all of my
certification," she says, "even though my psychiatrist said the drugs
wouldn't affect anything." As a result, Thornton was unable to go on
deployments, while her alleged assailant was "traveling all over the
Pacific."
"I felt like I was being
punished," she says. "I think it was just a way for them [the chain of
command] to make things difficult for me because they didn't believe me."
The administrative
position, however, gave her access to court documents and allowed her to
look up her own file. Thornton says she was appalled at what she found.
The CID (or Criminal
Investigation Division) agent in her case had taken the liberty to
completely revise her account of the assault. "She made it sound like I told
her that we went out and got drunk and had sex and I didn't really want to,
and afterwards I regretted it," she says. "It was nothing like what I had
[actually] said." Meanwhile, her case "went nowhere," she says, and her
assailant eventually received nothing more than a "slap on the wrist."
'A different truth'
Former CID agent Sgt.
Myla Haider told In These Times that Thornton's case is not rare.
"If there was an adequate response to begin with, it might have made it to
court and gotten prosecuted," she says, "but [Thornton's case] wasn't
anything unusual from what I've seen."
Haider has investigated
dozens of rape cases and says she almost always encountered a pervasive
"attitude toward victims," that guarantees the failure of the case.
"The investigators
themselves," Haider explains, "when working on cases, tended to focus on
reasons a victim could be lying." She described seeing "tag team
interviews," in which "one agent after another is sent in there to 'get the
truth' out of the victim."
"On occasion, that
results in the victims becoming very upset," she added, describing one case
in which a victim "went running out of the office and declined to cooperate
any further."
Every MST survivor
interviewed for this investigation told a similar story.
"My CID wasn't an
investigator, he was an interrogator," says Pvt. S. Clark, of North
Carolina, who preferred her first name not be used. "The thing that I
remember is him leaning over the desk, with his cigarette breath, screaming
at me, 'Why won't you admit that it was rough, consensual sex between two
drunken adults?' "
Clark's attacker had
beaten her so badly that, months later, she began having seizures, which her
doctors attributed to "cranial tearing." Still, she says, the CID agent
"made me feel as if I had dishonored my army and my country by speaking out
against another soldier."
Sometimes this attitude,
says Haider, leads to claims being recanted. "The law enforcement response
makes it so that victims don't want anything to do with the investigation
anymore," she says.
Even if the victim
continues to cooperate despite being re-victimized by law enforcement, the
focus on her credibility happens at the expense of collecting relevant
testimony, leaving the case little chance of surviving.
While physical evidence
is collected according to protocol, Haider says this can seldom prove
anything other than intercourse--useful for "stranger rapes," but irrelevant
for proving acquaintance rapes, which are the majority of cases.
"CID training does not
focus on evidence collection for acquaintance rape situations," Haider says.
As a result, "CID agents tended not to take acquaintance rape seriously."
CID spokesman Chris Grey
says that since Haider left the command, it has begun "a very comprehensive
Sexual Assault Sensitivity Training program."
However, according to
Haider, recent data call into question the effectiveness of that training.
According to the
Pentagon's "2006 Annual Report on Military Services Sexual Assault," 18
percent of the cases reported in 2004 were thrown out for being unfounded,
unsubstantiated or "lacking sufficient evidence," prior to reaching a court
martial.
In 2006, the first full
year during which the training program had the opportunity to reap results,
the proportion of cases thrown out on the same grounds more than doubled, to
37 percent.
Even when cases do
result in commander action, that action is rarely ever a criminal justice
response.
In 2006, only 292 cases
(out of 2,974 reported) resulted in a court martial. Meanwhile, 488 cases
resulted in an "administrative punishment," such as a letter of reprimand, a
discharge from the military, forced resignation or a reduction in pay or
rank.
"The 2005 reforms have
done nothing in terms of offender accountability," Haider explains. "There
are public service announcements and ad campaigns that say the military has
zero tolerance for sexual assault, but the reality speaks a different
truth." She said she doesn't believe there are many rapists in the military,
but those that are sexual predators learn quickly that they can get away
with it and will inevitably go on to attack again.
"They are sending women
into combat zones, but not doing what it takes to protect them," she says.
Avoidable tragedy
Protection, however, is
not only a matter of deterring crime through punitive measures. It is also a
matter of taking action to protect victims from their alleged assailants
after a crime is reported. That responsibility rests in large part with
commanders.
Thornton was allegedly
left to live in the same barracks as her assailant for a full six months
after her assault, despite repeated requests for a transfer.
Sara, a former Airman
1st Class who requested that her full name not be used, says that after her
assault in late 2005, she was met with the same indifference.
"I was never granted a
protective order, although I asked frequently," she says. "It also took me
three months to be granted a new room so that my attacker would not know
where I lived. Then they moved me into a room that was closer to his room
than the first."
According to Mary
Lauterbach, Maria's mother, it's that kind of negligence that may have cost
her daughter her life.
Maria Lauterbach had
obtained a military order of protection--a feat in itself--but was forced to
stay on the same base as her alleged assailant and attend meetings and
functions that he would inevitably be at, in spite of her protection order.
She was on her way to one such event on Dec. 14, when she was last seen.
Maria's mother is now
urging the Marine Corps to take greater steps to remove victims from harms
way and put distance between them and their accused assailants.
"We think the Marines
could have done more to protect Maria when she made the report," Chris
Conard, Mary Lauterbach's attorney, told NBC's "The Today Show." "We know
everything was done to protect the accused--perfectly proper. But they could
have transferred her to another base, another unit."
"It was an avoidable
tragedy," his co-counsel, Merle Wilberding, says.
'The second rape'
Leaving survivors in the
same place to fend for themselves also leaves them open to the scorn of
their fellow soldiers. Many survivors call it the "second rape"--the moment
when they realize that not only their command but their platoon, as well, is
going to desert them.
Lauterbach told her
mother that Laurean was "very popular" on base, and that after filing
charges against him, she was harassed and even punched by one of his
friends. Someone even keyed her car.
According to Clark, the
private from North Carolina, the hardest part of reporting her assault was
losing the "spirit of brotherhood" that she previously enjoyed in the Army.
"They all hated me and acted like I turned on them personally," she says.
"These are the people that if you go to war, you're supposed to stand up and
take a bullet for them. [Yet] they are the people that will turn their back
on you and call you a whore when you are assaulted."
Others were formally
punished for making complaints, and hit with charges for "false reporting,"
"lewd behavior" or "adultery."
Airman 1st Class
Cassandra Hernandez, 20, says three of her fellow airmen gang-raped her
during a late-night party at Pope Air Force Base in Fayetteville, N.C., in
May 2006. She says she reported the incident and sought all of the help
available to her. Nonetheless, she wrote in a letter to the governor of
Texas, her native state, "I felt like no one was looking out for my
interests."
Hernandez says she
stopped cooperating with the investigation when charges were filed against
her for "lewd behavior" and "underage drinking." The three men accused of
gang raping her were offered testimonial immunity in exchange for
cooperating with the prosecution.
After much media
scrutiny, however, her commander dropped the lewd behavior charge but still
gave Hernandez an administrative punishment for underage drinking.
Independence needed
According to the Dorothy
Mackey, founder of Survivors Take Action Against Abuse by Military Personnel
and a former U.S. Air Force captain and commander, the only way to address
the epidemic of sexual assault in the military is by establishing an agency,
completely independent of the Pentagon, that would be responsible for
investigating and prosecuting rape within its ranks.
"The agency would be
two-fold," Mackey explains. "One part that deals with nothing but the
victims, and another part that has prosecution authority."
Although such an agency
may be difficult to fund, she says, it would be in the interest not only of
military personnel, but also the civilian world. "When assailants' records
are kept clean, they return to the civilian world with no record of violent
crime and are kept out of the sex offender registry," she says.
In the civilian world,
that is significant. Nearly one in four veterans in state prisons nationwide
were sex offenders, compared to one in 10 non-veterans, according to a 2004
Department of Justice report.
Mackey believes the
military is incapable of policing itself because she says it glorifies
violence and shuns individual rights. And she's not alone in her thinking.
"We espouse violence as
the means to all ends," says former Maj. Tyler Boudreau, who resigned from
the Marines last year after 18 years of military service, and became an avid
blogger and war critic. "It is not curious when the individual soldier or
Marine packs that brainwashing home with him to his wife or to the barracks
where the females live."
Although Boudreau says
he preached the need to treat women with respect, the message was
overwhelmed by the glorification of violence as a means to establish
dominance, for both a man and a nation. That message, he says, transferred
into an "intensely chauvinistic" atmosphere.
According to ex-CID
agent Haider, the chauvinist culture might explain quite a bit. "Rape is not
taken seriously enough in the military because it is a crime that affects
primarily women--and women are still not taken seriously in the military,"
she says. "There is a lot more sympathy if the victim is a man because most
agents are male and they can relate to the violation. They are horrified by
that. But when it's a woman, it's the opposite. Their attitude is almost
contemptuous."
But she hopes that will
change.
So does former Pvt.
Jessica Doe. "What happened to Maria Lauterbach was a worst-case scenario,
but I know she wasn't the first to lose her life like that," she says. "I
just hope that her loss will open more people's eyes and help us to make a
change."
Maria Lauterbach was
buried with full military honors on Feb. 2, with her dress blues placed in
her casket. Her unborn son, whom she had decided to name Gabriel, was buried
beside her in a small, silver casket.
Approximately 900 people
attended the funeral service in Maria's hometown of Vandalia, Ohio. Among
them was Marine Lance Cpl. Robin Kahle, who drove 900 miles round trip to
place her own Good Conduct Medal on Maria's casket. She then paid her
respects by reporting her own rape to a high-ranking Marine participating in
the service.